COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADR METHODS IN PUBLIC LAW: A STUDY INTO THE PREVAILING LEGAL CHALLENGES

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADR METHODS IN PUBLIC LAW: A STUDY INTO THE PREVAILING LEGAL CHALLENGES

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADR METHODS IN PUBLIC LAW: A STUDY INTO THE PREVAILING LEGAL CHALLENGES

AUTHOR– SARAH SHARMA, A STUDENT AT LLOYD LAW COLLEGE, GREATER NOIDA

BEST CITATION – SARAH SHARMA, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADR METHODS IN PUBLIC LAW: A STUDY INTO THE PREVAILING LEGAL CHALLENGES, ILE LEX SPECULUM (ILE LS), 1 (1) OF 2023, PG. 128-135, APIS – 3920 – 0036 | ISBN – 978-81-964391-3-2.

ABSTRACT

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a common method of disputes without going to court. ADR has become increasingly popular public law, where disputes arise between the government and individuals or organizations. In public law, ADR can help resolve disputes administrative law, constitutional law, and human rights law. It allows parties to an agreement without a formal ruling, saving time and money. Additionally, it is a more informal and collaborative process, which can often lead to more satisfactory outcomes for both parties involved. As public law disputes can involve complex legal issues and a range of interested parties, ADR in public law has emerged as an effective way address these disputes without the for costly and lengthy litigation. The Use of ADR in Public Law is becoming increasingly popular as a means of resolving disputes. It is now used in a wide range of public law contexts ranging from administrative and regulatory disputes to complex and sensitive policy issues. The use of ADR in public can offer several benefits, increased flexibility, efficiency, and cost effectiveness compared to traditional. It can also help to improve relationships and promote understanding between, leading to better long-term outcomes. This paper examines use of ADR in Public Law, exploring its advantages and potential disadvantages and how helpful it is in resolving complex public disputes, further it explores the applicability, benefits, and limitations of ADR in resolving complex public disputes. It compares the effectiveness of different ADR methods such as mediation, arbitration, and negotiation in handling complex disputes involving public stakeholders.

Keywords– Arbitration, Negotiation, Mediation, administrative law, stakeholders, regulatory disputes.